![]() ![]() I personally advise the use of a protective filter as the merits to doing so are many. Of course, a required repair does not put the lens back into service immediately.Īn insurance claim puts a record with your name on it into the insurance company's shared claims database, potentially causing you to be considered a higher risk with higher premiums.Īnd there is probably a deductible to be paid with this approach. They say that *any* glass in front of their lens will degrade their pictures.Īnd their contingency plan is that a damaged lens can be repaired under their insurance coverage (check with your insurance agent for your specific coverage details before relying on this). The sans-filter users say that their lens hoods (you always use one, right?) provide all the protection they need. Let's take a look at the Should I use a protective filter? debate. Want to skip straight to the recommended UV filters? Just click here. Neither side is wrong in this debate, but they have differing opinions – and the freedom of choice. ![]() You will seldom see a difference in your image quality caused by using a high quality protective filter, but whether or not to use a protection filter is the big running debate. On a digital camera, the primary purpose of a Clear, UV or Skylight filter is to protect the front lens element.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |